Emerging and Trad Presbys

The world is evolving.  New things, new knowledge and experience, new shit, as the Big Lebowski put it, comes to light every day.  Ask Galileo if things remain to be discovered.  Ask the historic Church how they like confronting new realities that have come to light.

People, particularly ‘religious types’, are averse to change.  Quite happy to perceive life as it has been.  Being in an in-group only strengthens the human resolve to maintain tradition and refuse change, especially when the group has enjoyed some amount of dominance.  Movement requires effort.  Movement expends energy.  Ideologically and religiously speaking, mass movement rarely happens unless a crisis looms or devastation ensues.  Thankfully we do indeed have an obvious Presbymergency.

The lack of changeability is all very ironic when it comes to critiquing the Reformed Church – a prophetic movement founded upon a shift from the status quo.  Presbyterian USA folk like to think they are Reformed and Always Reforming, yet through the years there has been little reform, despite splits with the PCA, EPC, etc.  Certainly there has been pockets of movement in the Church theologically and socially – and more movement is always required!  We religious tend to resist change by citing that God never changes, and somehow that equates we should never change.  We are not God and our theology and way of being are not infallible but subject to our murky vision and finite position as particular human beings – even together.

To compound the PCUSA dilemma, people do not tend to shift when it seems they are at the top of the heap.  Many of the established rank in the denomination, remember the church at a stronger position numerically and financially.  People tend to hang on to what they have known and over time grow sentimental.  Often it seems, people that experience decline perceive that things are simply going to seed all around them, and so resolve to hang on all more to what they know.

The Church is not to simply shift by the whims of society.  The Church is to shift as it speaks and acts prophetically. If a church/denomination does exercise the prophetic function it will always be on the move.  If not, the church will certainly devolve into a social club, as Martin Luther King Jr. warned, and in time flake up and blow away, leaving the work of the Church to the prophetic.

The Emerging voice in the PCUSA is important for the Traditional PCUSA to hear and listen to as new things continually come to light.  May the Emerging voice allow for the tent of the PCUSA to be extended, not so that there is agreement on all issues, but  an awareness that we do not know all that we think we do – and together, with tolerance, we can reflect a broad range of opinion, and live in the dissonance of humility.

A New Kind of Christianity

Deborah Arca Mooney, a progressive Presbyterian as well as the Mainline Protestant Portal Manager for Patheos, had the chance to interview Brian McLaren about his new book and much more. She describes the interview in this way:

The interview was written from my perspective as a progressive Presbyterian and my interest in his cross-over appeal and work in building bridges across theological divides and religions. I had the opportunity to ask him a host of questions about his to reading “new kind of christianity,” including his unconventional approach to reading the Bible, the future of the emergent movement, what mainliners and evangelicals can learn from each other, inter-religious friendship, his views on the church’s response to homosexuality, and the spiritual practices that keep him grounded. His answers, as you might expect, were thoughtful, generous and inspiring. I hope you might share the interview link with your readers.

It’s a great interview and has some wonderful insights in it that would be helpful to Presbyterians who are continuing to seek out new ways of being the church in an emerging world. You can find the interview here.

Of Dying Breeds and Swelling Hopes: A Mainline Emergent in the Reformed Tradition

In the first part of this article (found in Fuller Seminary’s “Theology, News and Notes” Fall 2008 issue) I explore the similarities between the Emergent Presbyterians and the character Harold Crick, played by Will Farrell in the movie Stranger than Fiction. Crick overhears his narrator describing his “imminent death” and reacts with dismay screaming out loud, “What? What? Hey! HELLOOO! What? Why? Why MY death? HELLO? Excuse me? WHEN?”. In the PC(USA) Book of Order we are reminded that the church is itself “the provisional demonstration of… the new reality revealed in Jesus Christ [which] is the new humanity…” (G-3.0200 italics added). The church is “called to undertake this mission even at the risk of losing its life, trusting in God alone as the author and giver of life, sharing the gospel, and doing those deeds in the world that point beyond themselves to the new reality in Christ.” (G-3.0400). While I am a minister in the PC(USA) I have only come to Presbyterianism in the past 10 years. Newer to this whole thing, I tend to deal a little differently with the bad news of our imminent death. I get to be like the viewer in the film, and less like Harold Crick. I guess you could say I see it coming. But that doesn’t keep me from stretching into the life that is mine, and leaning into the script with all the more courage and passion. By the end of the film (SPOILER ALERT), Harold gets to read the script. He sees the poetry in his own ending and he is faced with the choice of leaning into that masterpiece with his very life. And this, I think, is what Mainline Emergents are doing everywhere.

I was asked by Ryan Bolger co-author of Emerging Churches: Creating Christian Community in Postmodern Cultures, to write a theological reflection on the Presbyterian perspective of the oxymoron of “mainline emergence” for Fuller Seminary’s “Theology News and Notes.” I have to begin by prefacing that a similar phenomena is happening in other religions including Judaism as well as many other denominations including our ecclesiastical siblings the Disciple, the PCA, and the EPC. Perhaps discovering others in this Emergence will be more an opportunity for reconciliation and integration and less an opportunity for division amidst an already small tribe. This, at least, has been the fruit of my friendship with Emergent Village, a generative friendship of Missional leaders of all stripes, ideologies, and denominations.

[Read more...]

What is Authentic Worship?

I am working on seeing how a 21st century, mainline, traditional congregation can receive new life by looking at the words of the ancient church.  I keep seeing, and hearing about, people who have left the mainline church for the big megachurches but who then come back because they want more tradition, more liturgy in worship.  One of the things I keep coming back to is developing a sense of authenticity in worship.  Like many of you I have heard about the importance of authenticity for postmoderns, as well as for others.  Folks in the pews (and in the pulpit) want to know what is ‘real,’ they want to know that what we are doing and who we are is genuine.  But that can be a slippery concept.  How do you define authentic worship?  What determines it?  What does/can it look like?