Hello Presbymergent World

What’s up? I’ve been lurking for a bit, checking things out. I have a couple of associations with folks here, and have been urged to add a voice.

Most notably, I recently responded to Bruce Reyes-Chow’s article he posted in the Outlook. To this point, I’ve only shared it with Bruce and blogged about it. Here’s my foray into a more public arena. But I thought I’d throw out to y’all and see what bounces back. If you haven’t seen Bruce’s article check it out before you read on, since I refer to some of the things he wrote.

Okay, so you read it? Skimmed it? Glanced at it? Good deal– here are my thoughts:

I found Bruce’s article in The Outlook incredibly helpful. For one, he has crystallized the “Postmodern” church—as much as something postmodern can be fixed—succinctly. Secondly, he has pushed me with the challenge of how to out myself as a postmodern.

I am serving an established congregation of folks who understand what the gospel is about; I believe Bruce summed it up with the simple phrase, “Jesus loves us.” This understanding, of course, transcends cultural shifts. And yet, while we have moments of postmodernity that creep into our worship, we are still mostly modern in how we shape our worship.

I recall when going before the presbytery to make the move from Inquirer to Candidate, one of the questions I was to answer had something to do with my understanding of the foundation of Christian faith. To me there was a simple answer to that question: Jesus said, “Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, mind and strength. Likewise, love your neighbor as yourself.” After briefly expounding upon this text, I eventually got the nod to move forward in my process. This core teaching of Jesus’ remains the core of my theological understanding. I keep looking for more theologically deep explanations for faith, but I continue to land right back there.

That’s why I’m so happy to be serving with the congregation of Noble Road. They understand that this is the meaning and purpose of the gospel: know the hold grace has on your life and respond in kind in the world. What I’ve discovered about these folks, though, is that many of them have put the proverbial cart before the horse. Many of the folks relish doing the work of the gospel without necessarily embracing the gospel. Or, maybe another way of stating that is that they are much more ready to serve their neighbor than to make affirmations of faith. The various articles of faith about God, Christ, and Spirit, which have been handed down to us in the Confessions do not resonate with them. And the more I intersect with them in their lives and in our lives together in
the community, the less convinced I am that parsing faith/theology past the great commandment really matters to folks.

Being church—especially the church at worship—is so much about speaking and saying words prepared by someone else; so much about about singing familiar, if not sentimental, songs to antiquated music; and, so often, a relatively rote exercise. (Obviously, this is not the case in point all the time, nor is it true that these forms of worship are always dry.)

I’ve recently rediscovered the importance of the assembled congregational body. Early, early on a Sunday morning towards the end of February, a storm system came through the area that left a coating of ice on everything. I received a call from one of our elders stating that she would not be able to get to church and had called other folks to caution them not to try to get out because it was simply too slippery and dangerous. After speaking with her I called around and eventually made the really difficult decision to cancel worship. So, on the spot we created and initiated a call-off-worship- because-of-ice phone tree. It was a weird call to make. And all day that Sunday I felt off-kilter.

A week and a half later, at a Bible study, the folks there each shared how off-putting not being in worship was for them; for the day and for the week. I shared that story with others and they had the same reaction.

Worship matters! As one of the bible study folks said recalling a conversation with a former pastor:

This pastor once said, ‘Sunday mornings are not about recharging your batteries, it’s about praising God.’ And I had to tell him, I’m sorry—and I understand what you are saying—but while I come to worship God, it is about recharging my batteries and getting my whole self in proper perspective for the week to come.” She followed that up by saying, “For me, Sunday is not the last day of the weekend, it is definitely the first day of the week. It sets the week for me.

This is a lot of narrative to swing back to Bruce’s point about being a Postmodern. His challenge for me is to take the bold steps so many of you have already done to change and experiment with this ever-important day/event (worship), to make it relevant and authentic and worshipful and energizing, for and within contemporary culture. The life of the church that accompanies our worship is already taking steps to be more friendly to the lives of folks {their lives outside the church, of course, having already co-joined with Postmodernity}.

I still haven’t yet figured out how to integrate the call to emerge into what the Spirit is leading us, but I am hearing and understanding the call to experiment, so that we may widen the ways we meet God on the journey. And I think this is partially what defines me as Postmodern.

Alright–I dove in. Hopefully I haven’t drowned you with words.

Better late than…

Sorry to be so late. I hesitated leaning into this site for many reasons:

The main one being time sensitivity. While serving as a validated minister inthe PC(USA) for a couple years since seminary, I recently joined my practices with a historied community of Presbyterians 30 minutes north of my neighborhood as their solo-pastor (their’s got to be a better word to get this point across). How I ended up there/here is a conversation for another time. But the responsibilities of pastoring a redevelopement-transformation congregation on top of buying our first family home (in our old neighborhood), my wife starting a small buisness (scrap booking), and organizing the mainline emergent/s event at Columbia have been about all I’ve had time for.

The secondary, underlying, reason for my being a late bloomer for Presbymergence, is the suspicion I hold for denominationally centered renewal movements. I, like many of you, have connected to the PC(USA) late in life for reasons that I can understand and ones I don’t know (how/why God and God’s new creation have conspired to bring me here, is still being discovered). Here are a few I have begun to articulate

1. because of the utility of the reformed articulation of faith practices (tangling Word, Sacrament, & Shape)

2. the polyvalence of a book of confessions (tangling many people/contexts)

3. the dialectical tension between tradition’s handing over of belief and the openness of conscience (tangling past/future with the need to act generatively now)

But I must confess I’m brutally pragmatic about these things. I’m not so sure that being tangled to some “good thing” that does not accomplish its end, is actually that “good”. At the Mainline Emergent/s thing I learned a bit more about this. We Presbyterians PC(USA)ers share many of the same blind spots and benfitted from Cooperative Baptist Fellows and Episcopalians, etc sitting next to us. I also learned that all the fruit the Mainline Emergent/s event brought, was intended for then; for that day/week/season. The future of missional communities in the way of Jesus will continue to necessitate the cross-pollination of the institutionally encrusted and naive, but cannot center on the cross-breading of the two. Emergence implies a comming anticipated newness, not a calculated hybrid. And so to preserve the generative and timely ethos of the Mainline Emergent/s event risks forming yet one more special interest group within the denomination and risks totalizing the naive or encrusted. In short, our dreams and realtionships get tangled up in helping the church, instead of edifying the church in her task to join the transformation of God’s world.

In the seven months I’ve been at Church of St. Andrew I have begun to learn the need for my colleagues here to know what will happen to “their our thing”. The existence of an established entity creates an inertia toward seeking the future of its establishment. The church, PC(USA) included, must continually give itself away to God’s creation, as Christ has for us all. I have my vows and tangles within this congregation, and the Presbyterian church. To truely serve with energy, intelegence, imagination, and love, I (and you) need more than the PC(USA), we need all of the church, and even beyond the church where the Spirit is moving and regenerating…
BUT, I’ve been reading the site and enjoy what I see. I am usually the last kid to jump in the pool or the river, but eventually I get in all the way and laugh and play. So, all that being said, I’m in. I hope that we can together seek the future of Presbyterianism God’s creation, utilizing all of creation the Reformed tradition that might be of help- and not the other way around.

peace | courage | beauty

Church Group Blogs

Last year we started a group blog for our church. Not that I didn’t think folks had it in ‘em, but the level of discourse and conversations has been truly life-giving for the church and I suspect for those on the blog team.

Unexpected joys . . .

  • Feedback and continued conversations around issues/thoughts raised during Sunday services;
  • Input and interaction between folks who may not otherwise participate;
  • Access point for some many who have a hard time connected in other ways: stay-at-home moms, introverts, etc.
  • Finding out how damn smart and thoughtful folks are;
  • Being reminded that I need not always lead, drive or instigate the conversations;

Has anyone else been doing this? Would love to see some other blogs our there in case we can “liberate” some design or content ideas. Blog on ya’ll!

Emerging Role of Pastor

Emerging Pastor
This past week at the Atlanta Emergent Cohort, we discussed the changing role of the pastor, and what a possible “emerging role” of a pastor would be. We had folks from different denominational backgrounds and that added to some of the richness of the discussion. I’ll admit that I went into the conversation hoping to find the “perfect” Emergent metaphor for the role of the pastor. However, that simply doesn’t work – and is very un-emergent.

Some of the metaphors that we brought to the conversation both from our experiences and our denominational perspectives are listed below:

  • CEO
  • Shepherd
  • Plurality of Elders
  • Chaplain
  • Shaman
  • Teacher
  • Poet Gardener: Someone who can connect with someone’s imagination – someone who will sow and work with something – to help grow it
  • Fellow Sojourner: Journeying together in the Kingdom of God – Westerhoff
  • Fosterer of Imagination – Helping others to live the re-imagined life – encouraging divine imagination
  • Visionary
  • Personal Trainer
  • Servant

Of all of these – I am most attracted to the Pastor as Poet/Gardener and as one who helps to Foster Imagination. However, a Korean friend who was there reminded us that those metaphors simply wouldn’t work in his Korean church culture. With the drive for success and competitive nature found in the Korean culture, the pastor would be a teacher, an educated guide – not a “gardener” or one who “imagines.” That only helped me to remember the cultural implications of context, and how that affects even what the role of the pastor might be.

So, who is the pastor? In the Presbyterian tradition, the pastor is the educated one – the one with the seminary education. The pastor knows Greek and Hebrew (supposedly) and is the one who can bring the Word of God to the congregation. The pastor is really an educator. It’s interesting to think about metaphors for the pastor – and to see how many of them have power imbalances inherent within them. For example, even the pastor viewed as Shepherd, one who cares for and gives guidance to the congregation makes the pastor the leader, the one who guides and protects the “sheep” – and clearly separates the pastor from the congregation – for the Shepherd is surely not a sheep.

What metaphor for pastor speaks to you? Have you found one that you think works? What is a good metaphor for a Presbymergent Pastor?

Presbymergent Pastors and Elders

Jan Edminson listed the following four “discoveries” that she made with the emerging church:

  • The pastor’s only responsibility, according to scripture, is to equip the saints for God’s service (Ephesians 4:11-12).
  • The church exists to serve the community not its members.
  • The role of Presbyterian elders is to be spiritual leaders, not to run the programs of the church.
  • The Constantinian Church is dead and gone forever.

I couldn’t agree more about points 2 and 4, but I believe that 1 and 3 might be good for us to consider separately.

I really don’t like the “only” there. I like to think that I am a Christian before I am a pastor–so I would not ask my congregation to do anything that I would not do either. I think part of my job of equipping the saints is being one of the saints.

I realize that we cannot do everything ourselves, but perhaps our model should be Jesus (not that any pastor can live up to that one!) Christ equipped the Apostles, but he also healed, washed feet, etc.

I know, of course, that he did this primarily with his followers, but my gut still tells me that we need to “get dirty.”

I DO believe that equipping the saints is a PRIMARY responsibility of Pastors, I guess I just believe that I will be a better “equipper” if I am also a “doer.”

What do you all think the role of the pastor is? The role is pretty well defined, for better or worse, by the Presbyterians. Much less so by the Emergent-types. I believe that the pastor will be different in different church, that’s for sure. I think I would define the role of Pastor as “facilitator,” but I also think that pastors (at least as we know them) will be less and less necessary in Emerging churches.

Elders will be different, too. I know that they were never intended to be “program runners,” but I want them to be more than “spiritual leaders,” because I don’t want to separate spirituality from life. Right now, I’m thinking the primary role of the elder is “respected discerner.” How does that sound to you all?

Presbymergent Editors & Guidelines

We have chosen 7 Editors to help give some leadership to Presbymergent.org. You can learn more about your Editors on the About page, but they are Jim Bonewald, Jan Edmiston, Neal Locke, Karen Sloan, Seth Thomas, Adam Walker Cleaveland & Brian Wallace.

We have also put together a few brief guidelines for the use of this site, Presbymergent. We don’t want to create a lot of “rules” for this site, but we thought it would be helpful to set a few parameters we thought would be helpful for this conversation.

1. It’s a Party – Keep it Fun, Keep it Beneficial
We’d like to invite you to our party. Whether you’re new to the emergent conversation or been involved for a few years, we are excited to have you here. Those of us who have created this site are eager for the possibilities of conversation here. We ask that you remember that it’s a party to explore how Emergent and the PC(USA) might work together. If your goal is simply to be argumentative or “rain on our parade”…well, please refrain from doing so. This doesn’t mean that our community will always agree on everything. Healthy discussion and disagreement can be very fruitful. Yet remember that we’re having a party here, not a debate.

2. The Party Hosts are PC(USA)ers – PC(USA)Requirement
While we at Presbymergent affirm in full the Emergent Village’s value of “Commitment to the Church in All It’s Forms” our intention for this site is facilitating a discussion specifically among those affiliated with the PC(USA) in some way. Our purpose in doing so is to focus the Emergent discussion to be helpful for those in the PC(USA). If you are not directly affiliated with the PC(USA), you are very welcome to read the material on the site and engage in conversation, but we are asking that “Contributors” be those with a direct affiliation to the PC(USA).

3. Adding Your Voice to the Party – Submitting Content
Anyone is welcome to add appropriate comments to any posts. However, because of our PC(USA) requirement, only those connected to the PC(USA) will be able to regularly post to the site. When you Register for the site, you will automatically be made a Contributor to the site. As a Contributor, you will be able to login to the site, write entries and submit them to be reviewed by Editors. Once posts are reviewed, they will be posted. We will try to keep the posting of new content to one or two posts per day (as long as content is submitted). So, if you write a post and don’t see it for a few days, just know that it will be reviewed and posted.

4. More Parties – Enhance the Online Community
We believe that this site could become a great resource & support center for those involved in this conversation. That said, we also encourage you to try to find ways to enhance the community and discussion that takes place here. Send an email. Pick up your phone. Grab coffee with someone. Attend a local Emergent Cohort. Connect with each other at Presbytery or National events. And share with our online community your ideas for more parties.

Loyal Radicals

UK Anglican church planter Bob Hopkins uses the term loyal radicals to describe those who stay on the inside of traditional churches to help bring about emergent expressions of an historic faith. You can read Bob’s article here, as well as my blog post here, reflecting more about how the concept of loyal radicals might be played out in our Presbyterian context.