Hope for the Church

When our kids come to be confirmed in the church they provide a sense of hope for the future of our church. But for many of our congregations this may in fact be the only source of hope! Should it be that way?

Typically, for growth and stability most of our established mainline churches rely on two sources for membership: 1) The kids they confirm in the faith, and 2) “churched” folks that circulate between churches. Our reliance on these ‘established’ sources for members reveals an “us vs them” mentality permeating our churches.

While the culture around us swirls in a sea of change, we are hard at work making sure our churches remain a safe haven for “us.” Fortressed in our buildings, we do church by gathering for worship on Sunday morning. Meanwhile our congregations have little contact with or real impact upon our neighborhoods, our communities, and the world around us.

In the early church through a vision shared with Peter, God shattered the “us vs. them” mentality that was keeping the faith within the confines of Judaism. Thus the doors were opened into the Gentile world. The “Way” has not been the same since Peter dared to share in fellowship with the Gentile household of Cornelius.

The real source of hope in our churches is not found in our confirmation kids.  As it was in Act, it is found in our ability to break down the barriers between “us and them,” between the church and the communities in which we live.

This is a brief summary of a complete sermon which can be found here.

Give it the Good Ol’ 10%

It’s a big world, and I suspect what I’m about to say is nothing new, but it’s a subject I haven’t heard much about in the emergent conversation (or anywhere else, for that matter).

Tithing is Out-Dated. By about 2000 years.

There are multiple references to tithing in the Old Testatment. In the New Testament, it’s mentioned a handful of times in the letter to the Hebrews (go figure), and just twice in the Gospels. Both of these consist of Jesus deriding the Pharisees for being perfect tithers, while ignoring things like love and mercy.

Typically, Jesus doesn’t abandon OT law. In fact, he usually cuts to the heart of the law and then surpasses it, with a formula that goes something like this:

“You’ve heard it said that you should [A], but I say you should [A+B].”

So what would that look like if we asked Jesus about how much of our money, time, talent, etc we should offer to God? Would he say:

“You’ve heard it said you should give 10% back to God, but I say you should give…?”

And then, what? 20%? 25%? %50? Surely not. That would be ridiculous. But consider these New Testament stories:

  1. The Rich Young Ruler. (He was asked to give 100%)
  2. The Widow’s Mite. (She gave 100%)
  3. Ananias and Sapphira. (They didn’t give 100%)

I know we have a tendency to explain these away and say, “well, what was really at issue here was…” thereby avoiding the uncomfortable notion of Jesus leading us somewhere that (like the Rich Young Ruler) we can’t follow.

So then, what if Jesus really does expect us to give 100% of everything we have? Time, talents, service, and YES…OUR MONEY TOO!

I know that we can argue forever whether or not that’s really what Jesus is asking of us, but I’m not too interested in that discussion. I’m more interested in this one:

If it’s true, then what does that look like? Communism? Madness? Voluntary Poverty?

I’m not sure, but perhaps we can take a clue from the world of sports — no one even bats an eye when the coach says, “I want you to get out there and give it a hundred and ten percent!” No one says, “Ooh, sorry Coach — I can’t do that. It’s just too much.”

Or maybe it doesn’t mean selling your house & car tomorrow and handing your pastor the check on Sunday. But maybe it does mean saying something like, “I’m financially committed to this ministry/church/cause 100%, and if it goes down in flames, so does my bank account. People do that with small businesses all the time, investing their last dime in the hopes of seeing it flourish. Perhaps 100% is like the Army Reserves — you never know when or if you’ll be called to make the ultimate “monetary” sacrifice of 100%, but when duty calls, you answer.

I’ve heard the expression “sacrificial giving.” I think it usually just means that you “give until it hurts.” That’s not the same thing as 100%. After all, what would it have been like if Jesus on the cross had said, “Ok, you’ve hurt me pretty badly, and I’ve sacrificed a lot of my flesh and blood. But you can let me down, now.”

Jesus didn’t condemn or even put down the Rich Young Ruler the way he did with other Pharisees. I’d be willing to bet that RYR actually led a pretty full and happy life, continuing to obey God’s laws. But he also didn’t get to walk daily in the company of the Son of God.

Is 100% too steep a price to pay for that experience? If not, then why do we, in most churches, keep trying to sell people on “Good Ol’ Ten Percent?”

Maybe we should ask them to sacrifice some cows while we’re at it…

Hello Presbymergent World

What’s up? I’ve been lurking for a bit, checking things out. I have a couple of associations with folks here, and have been urged to add a voice.

Most notably, I recently responded to Bruce Reyes-Chow’s article he posted in the Outlook. To this point, I’ve only shared it with Bruce and blogged about it. Here’s my foray into a more public arena. But I thought I’d throw out to y’all and see what bounces back. If you haven’t seen Bruce’s article check it out before you read on, since I refer to some of the things he wrote.

Okay, so you read it? Skimmed it? Glanced at it? Good deal– here are my thoughts:

I found Bruce’s article in The Outlook incredibly helpful. For one, he has crystallized the “Postmodern” church—as much as something postmodern can be fixed—succinctly. Secondly, he has pushed me with the challenge of how to out myself as a postmodern.

I am serving an established congregation of folks who understand what the gospel is about; I believe Bruce summed it up with the simple phrase, “Jesus loves us.” This understanding, of course, transcends cultural shifts. And yet, while we have moments of postmodernity that creep into our worship, we are still mostly modern in how we shape our worship.

I recall when going before the presbytery to make the move from Inquirer to Candidate, one of the questions I was to answer had something to do with my understanding of the foundation of Christian faith. To me there was a simple answer to that question: Jesus said, “Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, mind and strength. Likewise, love your neighbor as yourself.” After briefly expounding upon this text, I eventually got the nod to move forward in my process. This core teaching of Jesus’ remains the core of my theological understanding. I keep looking for more theologically deep explanations for faith, but I continue to land right back there.

That’s why I’m so happy to be serving with the congregation of Noble Road. They understand that this is the meaning and purpose of the gospel: know the hold grace has on your life and respond in kind in the world. What I’ve discovered about these folks, though, is that many of them have put the proverbial cart before the horse. Many of the folks relish doing the work of the gospel without necessarily embracing the gospel. Or, maybe another way of stating that is that they are much more ready to serve their neighbor than to make affirmations of faith. The various articles of faith about God, Christ, and Spirit, which have been handed down to us in the Confessions do not resonate with them. And the more I intersect with them in their lives and in our lives together in
the community, the less convinced I am that parsing faith/theology past the great commandment really matters to folks.

Being church—especially the church at worship—is so much about speaking and saying words prepared by someone else; so much about about singing familiar, if not sentimental, songs to antiquated music; and, so often, a relatively rote exercise. (Obviously, this is not the case in point all the time, nor is it true that these forms of worship are always dry.)

I’ve recently rediscovered the importance of the assembled congregational body. Early, early on a Sunday morning towards the end of February, a storm system came through the area that left a coating of ice on everything. I received a call from one of our elders stating that she would not be able to get to church and had called other folks to caution them not to try to get out because it was simply too slippery and dangerous. After speaking with her I called around and eventually made the really difficult decision to cancel worship. So, on the spot we created and initiated a call-off-worship- because-of-ice phone tree. It was a weird call to make. And all day that Sunday I felt off-kilter.

A week and a half later, at a Bible study, the folks there each shared how off-putting not being in worship was for them; for the day and for the week. I shared that story with others and they had the same reaction.

Worship matters! As one of the bible study folks said recalling a conversation with a former pastor:

This pastor once said, ‘Sunday mornings are not about recharging your batteries, it’s about praising God.’ And I had to tell him, I’m sorry—and I understand what you are saying—but while I come to worship God, it is about recharging my batteries and getting my whole self in proper perspective for the week to come.” She followed that up by saying, “For me, Sunday is not the last day of the weekend, it is definitely the first day of the week. It sets the week for me.

This is a lot of narrative to swing back to Bruce’s point about being a Postmodern. His challenge for me is to take the bold steps so many of you have already done to change and experiment with this ever-important day/event (worship), to make it relevant and authentic and worshipful and energizing, for and within contemporary culture. The life of the church that accompanies our worship is already taking steps to be more friendly to the lives of folks {their lives outside the church, of course, having already co-joined with Postmodernity}.

I still haven’t yet figured out how to integrate the call to emerge into what the Spirit is leading us, but I am hearing and understanding the call to experiment, so that we may widen the ways we meet God on the journey. And I think this is partially what defines me as Postmodern.

Alright–I dove in. Hopefully I haven’t drowned you with words.

Better late than…

Sorry to be so late. I hesitated leaning into this site for many reasons:

The main one being time sensitivity. While serving as a validated minister inthe PC(USA) for a couple years since seminary, I recently joined my practices with a historied community of Presbyterians 30 minutes north of my neighborhood as their solo-pastor (their’s got to be a better word to get this point across). How I ended up there/here is a conversation for another time. But the responsibilities of pastoring a redevelopement-transformation congregation on top of buying our first family home (in our old neighborhood), my wife starting a small buisness (scrap booking), and organizing the mainline emergent/s event at Columbia have been about all I’ve had time for.

The secondary, underlying, reason for my being a late bloomer for Presbymergence, is the suspicion I hold for denominationally centered renewal movements. I, like many of you, have connected to the PC(USA) late in life for reasons that I can understand and ones I don’t know (how/why God and God’s new creation have conspired to bring me here, is still being discovered). Here are a few I have begun to articulate

1. because of the utility of the reformed articulation of faith practices (tangling Word, Sacrament, & Shape)

2. the polyvalence of a book of confessions (tangling many people/contexts)

3. the dialectical tension between tradition’s handing over of belief and the openness of conscience (tangling past/future with the need to act generatively now)

But I must confess I’m brutally pragmatic about these things. I’m not so sure that being tangled to some “good thing” that does not accomplish its end, is actually that “good”. At the Mainline Emergent/s thing I learned a bit more about this. We Presbyterians PC(USA)ers share many of the same blind spots and benfitted from Cooperative Baptist Fellows and Episcopalians, etc sitting next to us. I also learned that all the fruit the Mainline Emergent/s event brought, was intended for then; for that day/week/season. The future of missional communities in the way of Jesus will continue to necessitate the cross-pollination of the institutionally encrusted and naive, but cannot center on the cross-breading of the two. Emergence implies a comming anticipated newness, not a calculated hybrid. And so to preserve the generative and timely ethos of the Mainline Emergent/s event risks forming yet one more special interest group within the denomination and risks totalizing the naive or encrusted. In short, our dreams and realtionships get tangled up in helping the church, instead of edifying the church in her task to join the transformation of God’s world.

In the seven months I’ve been at Church of St. Andrew I have begun to learn the need for my colleagues here to know what will happen to “their our thing”. The existence of an established entity creates an inertia toward seeking the future of its establishment. The church, PC(USA) included, must continually give itself away to God’s creation, as Christ has for us all. I have my vows and tangles within this congregation, and the Presbyterian church. To truely serve with energy, intelegence, imagination, and love, I (and you) need more than the PC(USA), we need all of the church, and even beyond the church where the Spirit is moving and regenerating…
BUT, I’ve been reading the site and enjoy what I see. I am usually the last kid to jump in the pool or the river, but eventually I get in all the way and laugh and play. So, all that being said, I’m in. I hope that we can together seek the future of Presbyterianism God’s creation, utilizing all of creation the Reformed tradition that might be of help- and not the other way around.

peace | courage | beauty

Evaluating Emerging Churches within the PC(USA) context

A committee of my synod (Lincoln Trails) invited me last fall to attend a meeting to discuss how we might rethink evaluating emerging new church developments. Present at the meeting were several presbytery executives, a synod executive and a lay moderator of the meeting and the congregational development committee. Also invited were two other new church development pastors from our synod (Won Ho Kim from Emmaus Road in Dekalb, Illinois, and Nancy Mockros from Life Path Church in Lafayette, Indiana.)

I’m the organizing pastor at Wicker Park Grace, in Chicago, IL. Our community has a 7-year New Church Development Grant (we stretched the 3/5 year grant out over a longer period,) and so in order to continue getting those funds, we need to show that we are developing in positive “successful” ways. (We’re beginning year 3 out of 7.)

I want to share here some of the things that came out of that meeting and open up a conversation about this at this site. This is partly probing the relationship between emergent churches and the PC(USA), especially when the denomination is funding them through the new church development funds of the Presbyteries, Synods, and General Assembly.

But what is success in an emerging church? How do you measure it? Here are some of our initial thoughts.

First, we talked about a changing paradigm. Where the bottom-line question has tended to be “How do we create sustainable models of church?” a new framing question might be “How do we develop vibrant missional communities?”

We talked about key values of emerging faith communities being: authenticity, spiritual discernment, and building community connections. This whole conversation was trying to explain, explore, clarify, and share the pastors’ experiences and perspectives on working with the emerging communities that we are working with.

Here are some questions that we came up with that might be asked of emerging churches (instead of “how many members do you have?” and “how many are in attendance at worship?” end-of-story):

*Describe the Missional Practices of the Emergent Community: How is the faith community engaging the larger community?

*Describe the Spiritual Practices of the emerging community: How is the community growing spiritually?

*How is community forming? What are the dynamics of the relationships that are forming? What kind of holistic community is developing?

*How do you know when someone is committed to the Community?

*Describe “contacts” rather than “members”: the number and variety of contacts, participants, covenant participants (if you use any language like this), and leadership of this Community.

*Describe contact with non-Christians.

*How are indigenous leaders being cultivated?

*Describe connections with the larger church.

I’m wondering what people think of these ideas, and also what are other new church developments or new presbymergent worship gatherings doing/thinking about in terms of success and evaluation?

Thanks for the opportunity to be in conversation!

Let’s share our websites

Dear Friends -
This is my first post. I stumbled on to Presbymergent last week while I was at the National Pastors Convention listening to a theological discussion between Doug Pagit, John Burke, Mark Driscoll, and Karen Ward. Still processing all of that.

We have been off in our own little corner in Philadelphia creating an expression of worship we call ‘South Ridge’. We have been up and running for two years and are really excited about how things are going. I would love to visit other people’s websites to get a quick introduction to what your worshipping community is doing.

To get the ball rolling, here is our website: www.SouthRidgeWorship.com

Looking forward to cruising your sites,
Langdon

Emergent and don’t know it?

Hi Everyone,

I’m the new “tentmaker” pastor (18 mo’s) of an ELCA/PCUSA church plant in Truckee, CA. While I am ordained PCUSA and we use a pretty much Lutheran order and style of worship – read… Holy Communion every Sunday (awesome) – I think my congregation may be emerging and not know it!

First of all, they are an ecumenical church plant. Second, they hired me as a pastor who works full time as a math/science teacher at the local middle school (just finished the new website)- nice. Third, we meet in the middle school cafeteria after being kicked out of the local AoG church – I was told I was leading my “flock” straight to hell after my 1 month old son was baptized. Fourth, I just got back from a worship committee meeting and they wanted to try something new for lent – “lets try having 5 minutes of silence after the sermon and show art/icons/images that relate to the sermon as a meditation” – great (quote from our retired music teacher/ pianist)! Fourth, two new Mac converts in the last month – oh and 8 new members too! Fifth, my folks prefer to do Bible study then work on the local Habitat for Humanity house, then go for a beer afterwards. Sixth, I meet with a few members of our church at the bar weekly (and they are over 40)!

All this and I haven’t really spurned them on save a couple of books on wholistic worship and visioning a church that is active in the community. And no one has brought up the term “emergent” except in my own mind as we talk at the council meeting (I still call it session, but I use “altar” quite frequently, much to my presbytery’s chagrin!).

Can we be emergent and not know it? I’m wondering how to lead them in a visioning process (1-5 years) that was initiated at the Congregational meeting last Sunday. Any thoughts/books/etc. that might be helpful to us?

Presbymergent Church in Northern Indiana?

Someone emailed us looking for a Presbyterian Church  (USA) in northern Indiana that was involved in the Emergent conversation. Does anyone know of any churches?