On his blog post entitled “Loyal Radicals” Adam Walker Cleaveland writes:
“Can Presbyterians (and other mainliners) be open enough to loyal radicals? Will a senior pastor “fudge” a bit on the Book of Order? Will a Session be willing to try something that everyone “knows” is going to fail, in order to allow for the possibility that there might be a different way of doing church.”
There’s a good chance that if one is here and reading this site they are a “loyal radical.” With that in mind, what are the key elements in the PC(USA) polity that cause us to need to “fudge” a bit on the Book of Order?
My goal in raising this is to help us to learn to “think creatively” about the PC(USA) polity. While I think that much of what is in the Book of Order was put there for a good reason I find that it can often be oppressive and downright suffocating when it comes to new ideas. So what are the road blocks? And how have people worked around them?







Join the Conversation