Church is people. People praying together, worshipping together, studying together, fellowshipping together. That’s Presbyterian churches and emerging churches, both.
And yet, the “together” part seems to come to an abrupt end when it’s time to prepare the weekly sermon. Most pastors I’ve known prepare by locking themselves, alone, in a study with a few tomes of commentary. The most interaction they ever get is with their computer’s spellchecker.
Seriously, I hope I’m exaggerating. I know that many emergent churches are moving away from the sermon altogether as the centerpiece of worship, but I suspect it still plays a part, especially in presbymergent ones. And I also think it still has a valid part to play.
So I’m curious to know what those of you who are in emergent churches, or those striving to become more emergent, do to open up the process of sermon writing. Is the idea of an entire staff, congregation, or community working together to create sermons just a reprehensible, slippery-slope kind of idea? Does it fall into that category of things that must be protected from laypeople at all costs because “we-went-to-seminary-and-they-didn’t?”
I’ve just started reading Doug Pagitt’s “Preaching Re-Imagined” which has a few things to say on the subject, but I find myself wondering…does even he go far enough? And is there such a thing as “too far” in a denomination that claims the “priesthood of all believers?”







Join the Conversation