Unchristian: What a new generation really thinks

I just finished reading David Kinnaman’s Unchristian: What a new generation really thinks about Christianity. It’s an insightful window into the perceptions of the Mosiac and Buster generations, both those in and outside the church, on Christianity, Christians, morality, and behavioral norms.  The data is drawn from extensive surveys conducted by the Barna Group, and the analysis is laced with pertinent stories and narrative.

While I found myself a little prideful that we Presbyterians aren’t subject to a lot of the perceptual problems that our more evangelical brethren are tagged with, the book nonetheless has some things to say to us as we try to reach these generations.

I’m wondering if anyone else has read the book and what you took away from it.

What wisdom can be found in the intersection of emergent and mainline?

A core value that Presbyterians hold is that of “connectionalism”.   The discovery or rediscovery the nature of this connectionalism is, I think, at the heart of the matter.

Previously held models of connection were based mostly on local initiatives, small story contexts, and homogeneous conversation partners.  The glue that held the PC(USA) together has been mostly institutionally based polity and judicatory structures.  This seemed to work pretty well until the middle of the last century when the world began to shift.  The scaffolding of this structure remains intact but the building that it once supported is going through a major renovation.  Like the anonymous poet said, “I thought the fire was out.  I stirred the ashes and burnt my finger.”  This core value of connectionalism can be a wonderful gift to the emerging world, IF we can find a way to change the scaffolding to fit the emerging structure.

This new structure, or emerging structure, is the gift that can be offered to the PC(USA) institution.  Here are a few aspects of a new connectionalism that I think can once again become a core value and gift to the wider church. [Read more...]

Emerging and Trad Presbys

The world is evolving.  New things, new knowledge and experience, new shit, as the Big Lebowski put it, comes to light every day.  Ask Galileo if things remain to be discovered.  Ask the historic Church how they like confronting new realities that have come to light.

People, particularly ‘religious types’, are averse to change.  Quite happy to perceive life as it has been.  Being in an in-group only strengthens the human resolve to maintain tradition and refuse change, especially when the group has enjoyed some amount of dominance.  Movement requires effort.  Movement expends energy.  Ideologically and religiously speaking, mass movement rarely happens unless a crisis looms or devastation ensues.  Thankfully we do indeed have an obvious Presbymergency.

The lack of changeability is all very ironic when it comes to critiquing the Reformed Church – a prophetic movement founded upon a shift from the status quo.  Presbyterian USA folk like to think they are Reformed and Always Reforming, yet through the years there has been little reform, despite splits with the PCA, EPC, etc.  Certainly there has been pockets of movement in the Church theologically and socially – and more movement is always required!  We religious tend to resist change by citing that God never changes, and somehow that equates we should never change.  We are not God and our theology and way of being are not infallible but subject to our murky vision and finite position as particular human beings – even together.

To compound the PCUSA dilemma, people do not tend to shift when it seems they are at the top of the heap.  Many of the established rank in the denomination, remember the church at a stronger position numerically and financially.  People tend to hang on to what they have known and over time grow sentimental.  Often it seems, people that experience decline perceive that things are simply going to seed all around them, and so resolve to hang on all more to what they know.

The Church is not to simply shift by the whims of society.  The Church is to shift as it speaks and acts prophetically. If a church/denomination does exercise the prophetic function it will always be on the move.  If not, the church will certainly devolve into a social club, as Martin Luther King Jr. warned, and in time flake up and blow away, leaving the work of the Church to the prophetic.

The Emerging voice in the PCUSA is important for the Traditional PCUSA to hear and listen to as new things continually come to light.  May the Emerging voice allow for the tent of the PCUSA to be extended, not so that there is agreement on all issues, but  an awareness that we do not know all that we think we do – and together, with tolerance, we can reflect a broad range of opinion, and live in the dissonance of humility.

A New Kind of Christianity

Deborah Arca Mooney, a progressive Presbyterian as well as the Mainline Protestant Portal Manager for Patheos, had the chance to interview Brian McLaren about his new book and much more. She describes the interview in this way:

The interview was written from my perspective as a progressive Presbyterian and my interest in his cross-over appeal and work in building bridges across theological divides and religions. I had the opportunity to ask him a host of questions about his to reading “new kind of christianity,” including his unconventional approach to reading the Bible, the future of the emergent movement, what mainliners and evangelicals can learn from each other, inter-religious friendship, his views on the church’s response to homosexuality, and the spiritual practices that keep him grounded. His answers, as you might expect, were thoughtful, generous and inspiring. I hope you might share the interview link with your readers.

It’s a great interview and has some wonderful insights in it that would be helpful to Presbyterians who are continuing to seek out new ways of being the church in an emerging world. You can find the interview here.

Presbymergent Website Redesign

We decided it was time to overhaul our old design we’d been using for a few years, so we did a redesign over the past weekend. We hope that you will come and check out the new site and let us know what you think. Presbymergent.org is much more than just a blog, and we wanted our new redesign to reflect that. We also wanted you to be able to connect with us more easily to Facebook & Twitter from our website, and we think that was accomplished with this redesign.

It’s also our hope to feature photos on the front page of what your Presbymergent community looks like around the United States – so please send us your photos of community gatherings, worship experiences, etc., and we’ll try to keep new photos rotating through the homepage.

One feature that we’re still trying to determine the best way to handle is the list of Presbymergent churches, worship gatherings and bloggers. Sticking lists of bloggers in our sidebars just became too unwieldy, so be looking for a “Friends of Presbymergent” page to come soon that will highlight some of you and your communities that self-identify with Presbymergent.

There are probably still some tweaks that need to be made, so if you see something, please let us know and we’ll try to take care of it. But we hope you’ll all enjoy our new website!

Richard Dawkins: Good Scientist, Bad Philosopher

Foxholes are unnecessary. There are no atheists in the dentist’s chair. That’s my theory at least.

After getting four teeth drilled on the other day in Charlotte, I had the only slightly greater pleasure of driving my Novocain-paralyzed face down to Columbia, South Carolina to see the infamous Richard Dawkins, the world’s most famous atheist. Dawkins, a British biologist, is part of the controversial neo-atheist movement. Neo-atheism itself is a highly vocal, if not outright shrill, atheist philosophy that seeks to argue, insult, and humiliate believers of all stripes into abandoning their faith—or at least ostracizing and ejecting them out of having any cultural influence. Dawkins’ last book and a key intellectual bulwark of this view, was politely named The God Delusion in honor of anyone moronic enough to have any belief of the divine.

I waited among thousands of students in Columbia with baited breath, for the neo-atheist circus ringleader to shock the crowd with resounding statements of intellectual superiority from his new science-oriented book, The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. I anticipated enough fire and brimstone to replace a Bunsen burner. I was instead stunned to hear a soft-spoken English gentleman request that ministers, priests, and pastors live up to their responsibility as community leaders by educating their flocks about the reality of evolutionary truth.

[Read more...]