Reformergents. . . UNTIE!

There’s so much excitement going on in the Church right now.  Too bad, just like in the media, that the stories that often get passed along have to do with the negatives–”society is degrading”; “homosexuals are taking over the church”; “we’ve got to save our children from this corrupt generation”.  I live in Florida, which is a generous mix of cultures, politics, social stratospheres and the like.  If you can think up some name for a church, we probably have it within a stone’s throw.  What is easy to see is that there are many things that divide us, but as a Presbyterian, I’m always looking for ways that we are connected.  Doing some community work to bring folks together has not been easy, especially when a few want to highlight the divides.

I’m one of these who is pretty certain we’re going through a time of Reformation once again, and as Phyllis Tickle might say, it’s not just the church that’s reforming, but every aspect of human society.  Everything is being brought into question and everything is on the table.  The appeal of Emergence is evidence of this as well.  If everyone were satisfied with the state of the Church, then there wouldn’t be such a movement of new ideas, questions and challenges.  I think the Presbyterian Church (USA) is slow to change and transform.  In some ways this has served us well, but when it comes to thinking about the future, we are either stuck in the present or trying to reclaim the past.  We are tied to some methods and systems that are antiquated, and yet the traditions of our faith don’t necessarily need to be re-written.  How can we learn from the emergent community how to let go and untie ourselves from the things that bind (imprison) us rather than seeing what might bind (unite) us together in the Spirit of Christ?

The Emergent church, at the same time, is asking questions to make us all a bit uncomfortable.  In many ways I appreciate being dislodged from the “zone”, but I also wonder if we lose something of Jesus in the midst of our questioning of all things faith.  What, within our tradition, is worth preserving?  I see so many (mostly out of fear) trying to preserve a Church that simply cannot remain static any longer.  In this regard, the emergent conversation has helped a great deal.  But what the emergent church can probably gain from the PC(USA) is the idea that we are not set apart from one another, but we are willing to persevere through times of difference and disagreement.  I’m extremely saddened by the congregations who leave the denomination because they don’t want to go through the marriage counseling.  Yes, it’s hard.  Any relationship is hard.  But in the end it’s worth the effort.  It’s how Jesus draws us together, I think.  Those of us who are Presbyterian have witnessed the Spirit at work within our bodies when we disagree.  Clarity does not come quickly, or even in our time, but it does come.  We could all stand to live with a little more patience.  We could also stand to gain by listening and not talking.  Just one pastor’s opinion . . .

Comments

  1. Stushie says:

    The trouble with emergent is that is it more anti-establishment than anything else. People are protesting against the traditions just because they don’t want to be a part of them, and not because their theology is strong. Thom Rainer’s book “Essential Church?” speaks more about this to both sides of the gap than any emergent speaker. Churches with strong scriptural traditions are growing; emergent churches are, sadly, beginning to disintegrate.

  2. Greg says:

    Great post, I’m all about the connectionalism of the PC (USA). If I’m in a group of hard-core traditionalist I’m often the most “emergent”, if I’m in a group of hard-core emergents I’m often the most traditional.

    Here are more thoughts I had.

    http://oregonbolt.wordpress.com/2010/04/21/reformergents-untie-reposted-from-presbymergent-with-comment/

  3. Tim — I think the counseling metaphor is helpful, thanks!

    Stushie — which churches have “strong scriptural traditions” and are growing? Could you also, please specify which emergent churches are disintegrating? I haven’t seen Ranier’s book, but will look for it.

    From where I live and serve, I am seeing the emergent cultural shifts regarding authority, etc as described by Tickle, surfacing in lots of places, including rural, traditional churches (some of whom have had strong scriptural traditions). There are no emergent churches per se in this area (on maybe in the whole of Wisconsin), but the questions being asked and considered within the emergent conversation are resonating up here in the woods.

    Anybody know if it is still holding true that the single most determinant factor in where churches/denominations are growing is birthrate? Low birthrate accounts for 70% of membership decreases in the PCUSA according to research published in Presbyterians Today.

Speak Your Mind

*